Why an Intake May Hurt Performance

Let others know about your performance modifications, and help members find the parts they want.
Post Reply
SamirD
Posts: 3074
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:07 pm
Location: HSV and SFO
Contact:

I was just reading the 1000 page service manual available here (well not every page), and came across some very interesting technology that may negate any gains by having a traditional performance 'intake' on the car.
The IMT system varies the effective intake pipe length by opening and closing the IMT valve in order to improve air volumetric efficiency.

As the intake valve in the cylinder head is opened and closed repeatedly, intake air pulsation occurs. If the intake valve is opened when air pressure is momentarily at the maximum level, the intake air volumetric efficiency increases. This momentary maximum air pressure depends on the effective intake pipe length.

When IMT valve is totally closed [A]:
The effective intake pipe length is longer. Engine torque in the high engine speed range drops, while it improves in the middle range.
When IMT valve is fully open :
The effective intake pipe length is shorter. Engine torque in the high engine speed range improves, while it drops in the middle engine speed range.

IMT system utilizes this characteristic of engine. IMT valve is closed in middle engine speed range, and opened in high engine speed range.

In this way, engine torque is improved in whole engine speed range.
Page 611 if anyone wants to look at the diagrams including what looks to be a dyno graph.
murcod
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2012 12:03 pm
Location: Australia

It's a split length inlet manifold. Longer inlet tract gives better torque at low revs, short tract gives higher power at high revs. They work extremely well- I had a vehicle back in 1995 with a similar system and had it dynoed with the system locked in both positions and in the the normal ECU controlled mode. The ECU switched the inlet over at exactly the correct revs for peak power and torque across the whole rev range. On the road, you could really notice the difference with inlet being locked manually in either position.
David
bootymac
Posts: 1602
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 1:04 am

It's best not to mess with most modern intakes nowadays. The engineers usually developed them to be as efficient as possible. Usually.
User avatar
LPSISRL
Posts: 991
Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 12:49 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

The SX4 J20b engine had the same setup. It was in the owner's manual. I wasnt' aware the Kizahi used the same system.
2011 Kizashi SLS CVT (silver)
2005 Honda Odyssey
Priors:
2009 Suzuki SX4 Cross AWD 5-speed Tech package (vapor metallic blue)
User avatar
Speed_Racer
Posts: 383
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:58 pm
Location: Salt Lake City

My '86 MR2 had a variable intake system as well (T-VIS). You could actually hear the engine note change when it made its switch. Though with the engine a foot or two behind your ears... you could hear everything going on back there haha.

The TVIS system was located "behind" the air filter, so you could swap filters without affecting TVIS, aside from how the airflow would change w/ different style filters.
'12 Kizashi,'03 SV650,'04 DL1000
SamirD
Posts: 3074
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 4:07 pm
Location: HSV and SFO
Contact:

Very cool to know this technology has been used in other Suzuki's and other brands!

I remember AEM making a 'version 2' type of intake that used a chamber that optimized intake flow at two different RPMs. Unless you've got a flowbench and a dyno, it's really hard to make power on the newer cars out there when they're done right. 8-)
Post Reply