murcod wrote:Live with the halogens and just buy better bulbs eg. Osram Nightbreaker. Proper HID lights also have the headlight washers and a self leveling mechanism built into them- to stop them dazzling other drivers. The internal optics of a proper HID light are also different to a halogen. There's nothing worse than having someone with an aftermarket HID kit blinding you at night.... They're illegal to fit here in Australia, but I'm not sure what overseas country's rules are?
PS: I had factory HID low beams on my last vehicle and would much rather just have decent halogen bulbs. There's a lot less to go wrong and the lighting difference isn't that huge.
No disrespect, Murcod, but my experiences and opinions are the opposite.
Over the years, I've had my fair share of experimenting with optimal headlight lighting. I am kind of obsessed in a way. I have tried Sylvania (Osram) Silverstars, IPF Super Low Beams, hi-gauge headlight harnesses, aux driving lights, aux fog lights, etc. and I must say that HID is really the best for light output. There is simply no comparison even if you get the best PIAA, IPF, Hella, or whatever halogen bulb.
Also, many of these high output halogen bulbs run hotter than a normal halogen. The result often ends in damaged headlight housings, damaged bulb adapters, melted wires, etc. I had IPF bulbs (reputable Japanese performance bulbs similar to PIAA) in my former Mazda3. They were better than the stock halogens, but nowhere close to HID in light ouput. After they damaged by bulb adapter from heat, I finally decided to give a HID kit a try.
What a difference. Absolutely a world apart in performance even though the IPF bulbs were among the best. After HID, I can't go back to halogen bulbs for optimal light performance.
HIDs are about 300% brighter than halogens of the same color temperature. They illuminate by a chemical reaction in xenon gas instead of a current through a filament in halogen gas.
Also, HID bulbs last about 7 years on average. Therefore, they are known to last a lot longer than a halogen bulb. They are also not susceptible to vibration damage like a halogen filament (an issue especially among offroad vehicles and motorcycles).
Given that the Kizashi requires the removal of the front bumper and headlights to change most bulbs, having HID is a huge advantage for this car, in my opinion.
Also, HIDs consume less power (most are 35W vs. the typical 55W halogen) and the bulbs also generate less heat.
I can't compare halogen in the Kizashi vs. a HID kit personally because my pre-owned car came with a HID kit. But given my personal experience with my former Mazda (which also had projector low beams just like the Kizashi) there is simply a huge difference in light output.
Also, as Murcod said, having HID in a non HID housing is not optimal. Having HID bulbs in a housing made for HID is the best option, but if you have a projector housing, the cut off of the projector lens actually does a good job not blinding oncoming traffic. That's kind of the point of the projector lens anyways; focused light where you need it and not where you don't.
HID kits are actually illegal in most places. It's illegal in the UK and the USA, but they are sold for "show purposes". The good thing is that if you are responsible and aim your light properly, it actually is not a problem. Having blue, pink, or purple HIDs and/or HIDs in a multi-reflector housing is clearly dumb, but 4300K to 6000K bulbs in projectors is actually similar to OEM HIDs. In fact, most law enforcement can't tell the difference so that's why it's not an issue.
Factory HIDs (HID bulbs in HID housings) are the best. I would say the second best is a HID kit in projector lenses.
Just my opinion.