


https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrew ... 1c03a67c18
where's the ROFLMAO smiley when ya need it....it just keeps getting better and better....
Without a doubt, Autopilot is not a better "driver" than an experienced and attentive human. However, not all humans drive in an optimal state. I'd much rather be driven by Autopilot than a human with a BAC of over 0.08 of which there are thousands on the road at any given moment. Machines will incontrovertibly improve and not get drunk, high, tired, or distracted. As for humans? Walk into any municipal courthouse to get a sense of how so many drive and those are only the ones who got caught.Ronzuki wrote:https://www.foxnews.com/auto/consumer-r ... ent-driver
Not that I'm a huge Consumer Reports fan or anything, but....
Umm... yeah, don't bet on that. When one of our major U.S. automation control component suppliers, just this week, stated to me they wanted to start charging for call-ins relating to the unbelievable increase in their pre-mature failed components for return across the spectrum of their 'programmable' components (you know, to deter people from making claims...just buy another one), you had better think twice about that misguided thinking. You see, I spend much of my day, everyday dealing with this non-sense as opposed to doing something productive and billable. Do you know why? Cheap, cheap, cheap...make it cheaper (and do more). Something has to give.KuroNekko wrote: Machines will incontrovertibly improve and not get drunk, high, tired, or distracted.