NiteRider wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions. We're looking around a 40K budget and all of those above fit the bill. What's your take on the Ford Explorer?
The current Explorer is no longer the vehicle that many Americans think of when they hear "Explorer". It was one of the first to go from a body-on-frame SUV to a unibody CUV. With that change, 4x4 went to AWD. It's basically a CUV now. Personally, I don't find it too compelling. Ford has really pushed the EcoBoost engines in these, offering both the 4 cylinder turbo and the 3.5 liter V6 turbo. While their performance figures are impressive, their real-world MPGs and reliability are rather poor. These EcoBoost engines often get criticized on these two fronts. Ford does offer a normally aspirated V6 engine in their base model which seems to be the safest bet for long-term ownership.
I just keep hearing bad things about the EcoBoost engines across the entire Ford fleet and the Explorer is no exception. The EcoBoost Explorers are commonly used as Police Interceptor Utility vehicles now but I've heard that police departments don't think too highly of them either. Personally, I'd avoid them if I was looking to own for the long term.
I think the safe bets are with the rather boring ones like the Highlander and the Pilot. I'd avoid the Nissan Pathfinder due to its problematic CVT issues. I recently test drove an off-lease 2013 Acura RDX with the V6 engine and found it to be a pleasant, refined vehicle. Nothing really riveting, but it'll probably spare you from frequent trips to the dealership once the Takata airbag recall is sorted out. It wasn't for me personally as I was acting as an advisor/scout for someone else interested in one.
Another one I think is interesting is the upcoming Mazda CX-9. They really improved this vehicle. It's all-new and now has a 2.5 liter turbo engine instead of the former Ford-sourced V6. However, I'd wait around to get it. This is a brand new engine for Mazda and the last time they put a new turbo in a CUV, it was a disaster. The 2.3 liter turbo in the CX-7 is infamous for poor reliability. Hopefully, Mazda got it right this time, but I'd let others test the waters first.
Another I personally find interesting is the upcoming Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. The technology isn't for everyone, but I find it very interesting and useful for those in an urban environment. It's the best selling PHEV in a number of places like the UK, Norway, and Japan. The US version will finally be revealed tomorrow morning at the New York Auto Show and is supposed to have improved specs for America. It's basically like a Chevy Volt but as a midsize CUV with electronic AWD.
However, if it's durability and longevity that I'm looking for, it's hard to beat the Toyota 4Runner. It's still a traditional BOF SUV that's made in Japan. It's always on the list for the "10 most reliable vehicles"/"10 cars that will last over 200,000 miles", etc. It's not fuel efficient nor refined by today's CUV standards, but this thing will get you through the rough stuff and do so for decades.
I think it comes down to what kind of purpose you and your wife want filled with the new vehicle. If it's an alternative to an AWD sedan, then I think a CUV would make more sense given the smoother ride and better efficiency. However, if it's utility like hauling, towing, and adventures regardless of weather or road conditions, I'd get an SUV.