Kizzy coefficient of drag
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 4:39 pm
I would have thought a little better than .29. The old Dodge Omni came as the "Omni 024" as a hat tip to the drag coefficient, ...well, at least that is what I was told by a dealer at the time... and that was with no under panels in the late 70's? early 80's. It was a fastback, but lots of square corners etc.
The More I think about it, I think it might have been an article I read at the time the 024 came out, But that would be an old memory indeed ;o) ...and you're right, at least looking at modern car's numbers it doesn't look possible. Perhaps a clay model during dev? lol, I don't know, but I also could find no information on exactly how the 024 got it's name. Odd since on the 024 wiki they ventured a guess on the Plymouth clone the TC3 (Touring Coupe with 3 doors)Woodie wrote:No way in hell, that salesman made that up. The Eagle Talon was .29 and it was way sleeker than an Omni.
Found:
http://www.automobile-catalog.com/auta_details1.php
Dodge Omni 024 1.7L
as offered for the year 1979
Drag coefficient claimed:
0.395
Drag coefficient estimated by a-c: (Not Listed)
(Still, my brain won't let go of thinking that the 024 was something to do with drag... might head on over to a Chrysler forum to see if anyone can give a hint as to its true origin)
http://www.automobile-catalog.com/auta_details1.php
Dodge Omni 024 1.7L
as offered for the year 1979
Drag coefficient claimed:
0.395
Drag coefficient estimated by a-c: (Not Listed)
(Still, my brain won't let go of thinking that the 024 was something to do with drag... might head on over to a Chrysler forum to see if anyone can give a hint as to its true origin)